“I don’t have any evidence to support the 30 per cent,but directionally it’s got to be right,and I suspect the quantum is not far out.”
Sims said construction affected everything from new supermarkets to office blocks and the cost increases were passed on to consumers.
“It also means there are projects that are not going ahead because they can only proceed if costs are below a certain level,and if the costs are pushed up because of activity by the CFMEU,then that means some projects don’t go ahead,” he said.
“It’s quite clear to me,from general observation over a long time,that that is exactly what’s happening.”
Master Builders Australia commissioned Queensland Economic Advocacy Solutions to analyse CFMEU wage deals that imposed sweeping conditions that could stop work,limit hours and put other restrictions on how work was done.
The analysis said an apartment project would be 3.5 per cent more expensive with a low application of the CFMEU provisions,18.2 per cent more costly with a medium application and 33 per cent more expensive with a high application of the rules.
This meant a two-bedroom unit in Brisbane would cost $287,000 more than otherwise,it said. A three-bedroom unit would cost an extra $430,000,pushing its cost to $1.7 million.
CFMEU national secretary Zach Smith has not responded to requests for comment since the government’s announcement on Wednesday,and it is not yet known whether he will support the administration process.
Independent economist Harley Dale,who was the Housing Industry Association’s chief economist for 17 years,said CFMEU conduct at building sites had hampered productivity and added costs to consumers in both the residential and commercial sectors.
Loading
Labour costs were also a factor alongside issues such as planning delays,the cost of construction materials and the shortage of skilled workers,he said.
“There’s been a trend in the decline of labour productivity in construction since 2014 and it had a fresh low in 2023 after more than 10 years,” he said.
“I would argue that some of the obstructive behaviour on the part of the CFMEU has certainly been part of that.
“All of that’s got to feed through to the bottom-line pricing of these construction projects. Absolutely,it has to be passed on.”
The CFMEU has been contacted for comment.
Loading
Australian Bureau of Statistics figures show labour productivity has fallen 18.1 per cent in the construction sector since 2014.
By comparison,labour productivity fell 7.4 per cent in manufacturing and 3.9 per cent in transport over the same period,and increased by 19.3 per cent in professional,scientific and technical services,and by 31.5 per cent in agriculture,forestry and fishery.
Australian Constructors Association chief executive Jon Davies said the economy could be stronger if the labour slump was reversed in the building industry,highlighting an economic case for the government’s move against the CFMEU.
“If you look at productivity growth over 30 years,the gap between construction and other industries is about 33 per cent,” Davies said.
“Productivity has actually fallen in construction. If you apply that 33 per cent to the contribution of the construction industry to the economy,you get $56 billion. That’s the opportunity if we can close that gap.”
Burke said on Wednesday that if the appointment of an administrator was challenged in the Federal Court,he would introduce a bill in the parliament “to remove any barriers” to the leadership overhaul.
A government source said the process to draft the law had begun.
CFMEU Queensland secretary Michael Ravbar has vowed to oppose government intervention,while the NSW branch urged members to defend the union.