Wreckage at the scene of Sunday's Ethiopian Airlines crash south of Addis Ababa.

Wreckage at the scene of Sunday's Ethiopian Airlines crash south of Addis Ababa.Credit:AP

The sensor's role in engaging MCAS will put more scrutiny on whether Boeing was too reliant on a single device to trigger an important change in the jetliner's trajectory.

Normally,aircraft manufacturers use multiple data points to guide a plane's automated systems. Regulators,lawmakers and federal investigators are reviewing whether Boeing cut corners as it raced to get the 737 MAX to market to counter Airbus SE's A320neo aircraft.

Evidence from the flight-data recorder of the Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 showed that the missing sensor was malfunctioning and that a device known as a"stick-shaker"-- which makes a loud nose and rattles a pilot's control column to warn of an impending aerodynamic stall -- had been activated on the same side of the aircraft. It could be heard on the cockpit voice recorder,the person said.

The details about the sensor,which haven't previously been reported,indicate a scenario similar to the one on the final flight of a Lion Air jet that crashed on October 29 off the coast of Indonesia.

The pilots were battling an automated feature called the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System,MCAS for short,and weren't able to shut if off as the jet plunged into the Java Sea. That accident claimed 189 lives,while the Ethiopian crash killed 157.

Advertisement

Unanswered questions

The preliminary data showing that MCAS was active during the Ethiopia flight is the first hard link between the two crashes that resulted in the grounding on March 13 of the 737 MAX,the newest version of Boeing's single-aisle workhorse.

But the information also leaves unanswered many questions,they said.

Boeing and the US Federal Aviation Administration issued a bulletin after the Indonesia crash alerting pilots to the potential for MCAS to push down a plane's nose during a malfunction and highlighted a relatively simple procedure to disable it if that occurred -- turning off two switches in the cockpit.

Ethiopian Airlines trained its pilots on how to perform the procedure,airline officials have said.

Pilot procedure

Pilots can overcome MCAS in the short run by hitting switches on their control column that control a plane's trim to raise its nose. Activating those switches temporarily disables MCAS,though only for a few seconds at a time.

A separate procedure to shut off power to the plane's trim motors,which pilots on all 737 models are taught,is how Boeing advises pilots to handle an MCAS malfunction. There is a separate manual trim system that can be used to control a plane after such an emergency.

Loading

The reason why the angle-of-attack sensor would have malfunctioned in the Ethiopia crash isn't yet clear either,said the people. Finding the device in the wreckage may provide evidence as to whether it was damaged -- which could occur while the plane was on the ground or from a bird during takeoff or flight -- or suffered some other fault.

A spokesman for Ethiopian Air,Transport Minister Dagmawit Moges and Ethiopian Civil Aviation Authority Director General Wosenyeleh Hunegnaw didn't respond to messages seeking comment on the angle of attack sensor.

Representatives of Boeing and the FAA declined to comment and the US National Transportation Safety Board said it couldn't comment on a foreign-led investigation.

In the Lion Air tragedy,the sensor had failed on an earlier trip and wasn't repaired before the fatal flight,according to initial findings.

The Wall Street Journal reported earlier on Friday that the MCAS had activated before the Ethiopian Airlines plane crashed.

Bloomberg

Most Viewed in Business

Loading