After three months of acrimonious negotiation and industrial action,the company agreed to pay a 2.5 per cent wage rise plus some better conditions,such as five days’ domestic and family violence leave. Union officials accused Lowe of hypocrisy. “If even the people who literally print money won’t treat their workers with respect and fairness,then clearly we have to change the rules so workers can get the pay rises we deserve,” the Electrical Trades Union Victorian secretary,Troy Gray,chided. “Even the Reserve Bank won’t give workers a pay rise willingly.” Ouch.
Lowe is more active on another progressive front,however – hiring more women to join the bank’s staff of 1300 people. Thanks to his teenage daughter,as it happens. “They’d done a unit at school,obviously,” relates the father. “My daughter had been told,‘If you have a mother or father with influence,you should ask them what they’re doing to help women.’ I remember the day – I’d had a long day – I’d picked my son up from tennis lessons,it was 8 o’clock,I hadn’t had dinner,I walked in the door and I got hit with this deep question,and I fobbed her off.
“She said,‘That’s not good enough.’ It made me think about what we were doing,particularly the ‘demonstration effect’ ” – meaning that more women will aspire to work at the RBA and expect senior posts if there are women already doing just that.
When Lowe first related this story in a 2017 interview,it immediately attracted the contempt of Mark Latham. The former Labor leader used his position as a commentator onSky News TV to attack the then 15-year-old Zara:“I say to the young Miss Lowe,‘Get some interest in people unlike yourself:the disadvantaged,the poor,people who don’t grow up in the household privileged to be the daughter of the governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia.’ It’s called social justice and caring about others.”
Zara responded with spirit. “She wanted to have a joint press conference with me,” to respond to Latham,Lowe says. “She said she could stand up next to me and she could articulate why it’s important to support women,and how she has broader social vision than just promoting women.” It took Dad a few days to persuade his daughter that “it wasn’t really appropriate”,as he puts it. “Your kids keep you on your toes,don’t they? She’s quite feisty.”
The upshot? The RBA set a target that women should comprise 35 per cent of its managers,a target it hit last year. Its next target is for 50 per cent,though Lowe calls it “an ambition,not a quota”,and he’s set no deadline for achieving it. He does seem pleased to report that of the bank’s five assistant governors,three are women.
Philip Lowe's interests seem pretty banal and routine for a 58-year-old central banker. For instance,he doesn’t cook and pays no attention to food. If he can get to bed by 10pm,you’ll find him cycling around Centennial Park before dawn the next day,and he often swims at lunchtime at the city’s Cook + Phillip Park pool.
So it’s a surprise to see a pair of Aboriginal mimi sculptures towering by his office doorway;two tall,thin,timber representations of the spirit people of northern Australia. He explains their purpose:“They’re supposed to watch over you,give you inspiration and be a bit cheeky.”
These mystical beings are part of the RBA’s extensive collection of Indigenous art started by its inaugural governor,the storied public servant H.C. “Nugget” Coombs. Coombs also served as inaugural chair of the Council of Aboriginal Affairs after the 1967 referendum gave the first Australians the constitutional right to be counted as Australians. He was a passionate
advocate for Indigenous rights.
The mimis seem out of character for Lowe,but he explains that he’s a lover of Indigenous art and has his own collection at home. In fact,he’s also revived Coombs’s connection with some of the Indigenous communities of east Arnhem Land. Lowe,too,seems to have an unexpected passion.
In July,with two members of the RBA board,he visited the remote Yolngu people around Yirrkala. Coombs had his ashes divided between the Australian National University,which he helped found in 1946,and Yirrkala,which is on the far northern tip of the Northern Territory,roughly as far from Darwin as it is from Indonesia.
Coombs advocated for the traditional owners to share in the mineral wealth being extracted from a bauxite mine on their land in a landmark case. It began when the federal government appropriated some 300 square kilometres of Yolngu land without a word of consultation and gave it to a mining company,Gominco. The local people did not meekly accept,but instead wrote the famous Yirrkala bark petitions asserting their ownership of the land. It was a beginning of the long struggle to recognise Indigenous land title.
During that July trip,Lowe visited the spot where half of Coombs’s ashes are buried to commemorate the man and the connection. “I unveiled a plaque – big celebration,singing and dancing with spears and sticks,and it was fantastic,one of the funnest things I’ve done at work.” He was pleased to see that the people have used the royalties from the mine,now owned by Rio Tinto,to invest in the community. They’ve also built a future fund against the day when the mine runs out. He describes it as “not a great story,but it is a pretty good one”.
He adds,“I would like the Reserve Bank to continue the connection with people of Eastern Arnhem Land. They make sure anyone who wants employment has employment. They struggle with the downside of remoteness.” The bank encourages Indigenous graduates:“We finally flew the Aboriginal flag – too late,but we did it – and we have Indigenous graduates. We very much encourage Indigenous kids,wherever we can see people with interest in economics,finance,technology. I’m always looking for good ideas to help in economics and,drawing from my own experience,looking for people without much opportunity and giving them opportunity.”

Philip Lowe’s career began in 1980 at the RBA,where he has worked ever since.
For the young Philip Lowe,fresh out of high school,that helping hand came in the form of an RBA bursary that paid him to work at the bank part-time and study economics at Sydney’s UNSW the rest of his time. Hilariously,his parents wouldn’t let him accept the offer until they’d travelled from Cootamundra to Sydney to interview the RBA. To make sure it was worthy of their son’s talents. Other than journalists,Lowe believes,his parents are the only people ever to interview the central bank. It was 1980. He’s worked there ever since. The bank offered him many other opportunities,including the chance to study for his PhD at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
He worries about the scope of opportunity for the young today. One fashionable fear he rejects,however,is the claim that artificial intelligence and robots represent “the death of work” for the next generation as machines displace humans. “One hundred per cent wrong,” says Lowe. “For every job that technology destroys,it creates another one at least,and it creates higher real living standards.
“I’d also point out that the jobless rates in the major Western economies today are the lowest we’ve had in 30,40,50 years.” (About 30 in Australia other than 2008’s record low,40 in Britain,50 in the US.) “Technology doesn’t destroy jobs – it creates them.”
But he adds two essential conditions. “One is the distribution of income that comes with that. Some of the new jobs are going to have much higher incomes than some of the older jobs,so there’s a transition issue” – sharply greater inequality. “The other one is that individual jobs do get destroyed by technology – new jobs are created but not necessarily for the same people,so society has to find ways to help people who lose jobs through technology to find other jobs elsewhere in the system. So if we can manage that process and somehow stop wage inequality from becoming too large,I’m confident technology will deliver higher standards of living.”
And if the political system can’t manage those two side effects? “Then society becomes unhappy and starts looking to politicians to provide solutions to that unhappiness. My observation,looking around the world,is that most of the solutions being provided aren’t very sensible.” In other words,mad populism – the kind that has taken over the White House and the prime ministerial offices and presidential mansions of half a dozen other nations but so far been held at the fringes in Australia – arrives here,too.
It’s entirely possible that new forms of power generation emerge that are not only good for the climate but improve future living standards.
Philip Lowe
And while the RBA has recently named climate change as a source of “first-order economic effects”,Lowe is not despairing at the lack of progress. He recalls returning to Sydney in 1991 after studying at MIT in the US and telling his RBA manager about an exciting new communications technology called email. “Why on earth would we want that?” came the reply. Lowe had to write a business case for using email before the bank grudgingly introduced one account per department.
His point? “We had no idea 25 years ago how the world would be transformed by technology. If we can address the climate,it gives us a better chance that the next generation will have a better standard of living.” But he thinks Australia’s debate about electricity is too narrow.
“By nature I’m inherently optimistic about the ability of humans to solve problems. It’s entirely possible that new forms of power generation emerge that are not only good for the climate but improve future living standards … in ways we can’t dream about.”

Philip Lowe,photographed in the RBA’s vault in Martin Place,Sydney.Credit:Louie Douvis
So what does the governor worry about? He worries about opportunity and about inequality. He worries that Australia’s education system needs to do better to equip everyone to be able to enjoy the opportunities the country offers. And he worries that high house prices can entrench inequality from one generation to the next.
“Eventually a house gets passed to kids or grandkids,and gets passed down at high prices,” he says. “What if you come from a family that’s renting,or where the house price is not particularly high – they will find it much more difficult.”
Hold on. Aren’t you to blame? Wasn’t it the RBA,by keeping interest rates so low for so long,that created the “bubble” in house prices? “It was a contributor,” Lowe concedes,“but not a prime contributor. If you ask any first-year economics student,what’s going to happen to housing prices – we all want to live in fantastic locations by the coast,each person have a large block of land,and under-invest in transport,and allow fast population growth,please explain? I think you’re going to get high housing prices.”
The solution,he says,lies in this potent insight:“Infrastructure investment is actually the best housing policy.” How so? “There’s very little we can do to increase the supply of well-located land but there’s one thing you can do – build great transport. So we can increase the supply of well-located land through well-designed transport,public and private. If we can do that then the value of the land that each dwelling uses will be less,people will be happier,the community will be stronger,housing prices will be lower relative to income,some of the consequences for the distribution of wealth will be better.”
People started saying,‘It looks like your banks are crooked,you’ve got all this political dysfunction,and,for a while there,your cricket team was cheating.’
Philip Lowe
But Lowe’s greatest and most urgent worry is the near future of the economy. He is recognised in public a lot more often these days compared to a few months ago. Fellow train passengers are much more likely to ask him for a selfie when he’s on his way to work. He always agrees,by the way,because he thinks it’d be rude to do otherwise.
The reason is simple. After three years without any movement in interest rates,the RBA in June and again in July decided to cut,and cut decisively. The darker the outlook,the cheaper the money. The greater the fear for the economic future,the easier Lowe wants to make it to borrow,to spend,to invest. As things turn down,Lowe wants to give you a reason to spend up.
But he knows that interest rates – monetary policy – has its limits. “Monetary policy cannot deliver medium-term growth,” Lowe told the US Federal Reserve gathering at Jackson Hole. “We risk just pushing up asset prices.” Meaning a revival of the housing bubble,as one potential side effect.
Just as he is not terribly impressed with the riches in his vaults,he’s not terribly impressed with his own powers over interest rates – alone – to rescue Australia from an international abyss. That’s why Lowe has campaigned relentlessly for the federal government to do more to generate economic activity.
“The best option,” Lowe says,is “creating an environment where firms want to innovate,invest,expand and hire people. I think that’s the best option. I’m sure at the analytical level the government would agree. The challenge they have is to develop a program to do that.”
He has repeatedly called on governments,state and federal,to invest more,much more,in infrastructure,too. Labor’s shadow treasurer Jim Chalmers remarks that Lowe’s job is “a tough gig made harder because the government won’t come to the party with helpful fiscal[budget] policy. I sense and understand the frustration he was expressing at Jackson Hole about how monetary policy’s being left to do all the work.”
But the Treasurer,Josh Frydenberg,does not acknowledge any tension. He says that the government is doing on infrastructure just what the governor wants:“His argument is that the Commonwealth and states need to have long-term,continuous pipelines of projects in construction and planning. That’s what we have.” And on budget spending:“We both see the fundamentals of the Australian economy as strong,but point out challenges ahead.” The Treasurer doesn’t want to engage. “I’m comfortable with him talking on a whole range of topics. It’s not for me to tell Phil,‘These are the areas you can speak on.’ He’s independent.”

Philip Lowe and Treasurer Josh Frydenberg are pulling in different economic directions.Credit:AAP
But with Lowe making a concerted effort to stimulate growth by cutting rates and Frydenberg committed to delivering a budget surplus,the two great arms of policy will be pulling in opposite directions. One expanding,one contracting. The point must surely come when the government will either follow Lowe’s advice or wish he’d shut up.
Josh Frydenberg,Scott Morrison,be warned – the governor has no intention of shutting up. Asked whether he’d go quiet if the government no longer wished to hear his message,Lowe replies:“Certainly not.” No politician has suggested he should go quiet,he attests. “I wouldn’t expect that they would ever do it,partly because it’d be the wrong thing to do and also partly because they know I’d ignore it. I can only see losers out of doing that. There’s no benefit to come from that.”
The RBA is protected by its own act of Parliament. Lowe is only three years through a seven-year term. The RBA’s ultimate protection,however,may be that it has immensely higher levels of public confidence than any Parliament or politician. It is among the country’s most trusted institutions,consistently just trailing the High Court,the ABC and the police. Federal politicians,together with journalists,talkback radio hosts and used-car salesmen,populate the other end of the credibility scale.
Loading
The contrast between an activist central bank and a complacent federal government grows ever more obvious,the economic challenge ever more urgent. Lowe worries for his country. “Up until two years ago,whenever I’d go to international meetings,people would say,‘Can you tell me what the secret of Australia’s success is? Decades of uninterrupted economic growth and fantastic,profitable banks that survived the financial crisis,low unemployment,low and stable inflation,the mining boom. So,what’s the secret of your success?’
“Two years ago,maybe less than that,I noticed a change. People saying,‘What’s going wrong with Australia?’ Maybe it started with the banks,particularly when the royal commission started and all these stories coming out of the bank system,so people started saying,‘It looks like your banks are crooked,you’ve got all this political dysfunction,and,for a while there,your cricket team was cheating.’ So,I’ve had multiple conversations on this,‘Your banks aren’t as good as you used to think,the political system is changing leaders every year,and your cricketers cheat. What is going wrong with Australia?’ ”
Not all the money in Phil Lowe’s vaults can answer that challenge.
Correction: The original version of this article stated that the Treasurer's signature was on Australian bank notes. It is in fact the signature of the secretary to the Treasury.
To read more from Good Weekendmagazine,visit our page atThe Sydney Morning Herald,The Age andBrisbane Times.