In a separate submission,the 13-member Australian Discrimination Law Experts Group (ADLEG),said the bill was"deeply flawed",prioritising religious beliefs over the rights of LGBTIQ Australians,people with a disability and women.
The ADLEG,which includes Sydney University professor Simon Rice and Melbourne University professor Beth Gaze,said the bill's wide definition of"statements of belief"meant current unlawful acts of discrimination would"likely become lawful if based on religious belief".
Loading
As an example,a receptionist in a medical practice telling a person with a disability"they have been given their disability by God so they can learn important lessons"would be protected.
In explanatory information accompanying the bill,the government said it would not be discrimination under any Australian anti-discrimination law for"merely expressing ... genuinely held religious beliefs in good faith".
Attorney-General Christian Porter said the bill's approach to statements of belief was a"common-sense position".
"In essence,the bill simply takes the uncontroversial position that,on their own,mere written or spoken words are not discrimination — provided they express genuine religious beliefs and are stated in a way that is not malicious and does not harass,vilify,threaten,intimidate or urge criminal offences."