Australia, insurance, car, home, live, holidays

While the prospect of the highest court in the land throwing out the results of a democratic election based on unfounded charges of voter fraud is extraordinary unlikely,it wouldn't change the outcome. President-elect Joe Biden would still be the winner even without Pennsylvania because of his wide margin of victory in the Electoral College.

“The petition seeks all appropriate remedies,including vacating the appointment of electors committed to Joseph Biden and allowing the Pennsylvania General Assembly to select their replacements,"Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani said in a statement.

He is asking the court to move swiftly so it can rule before Congress meets on January 6 to tally the vote of the Electoral College,which decisively confirmed Biden's win with 306 electoral votes to Trump’s 232. But the justices are not scheduled to meet again,even privately,until January 8,two days after Congress counts votes.

Pennsylvania last monthcertified Biden as the winner of the state's 20 Electoral College votes after three weeks of vote counting and a string of failed legal challenges.

Trump’s campaign and his allies have now filed roughly 50 lawsuits alleging widespread voting fraud. Almost all have been dismissed or dropped for lack of evidence to support their allegations.

It comes as sources revealedTrump held a meeting with his former national security advisor Michael Flynn and other supporters at the White House on Friday,to discuss military options to overturn his loss. According toThe New York Times,the President asked Flynn to expand on the idea of declaring martial law. During the meeting,described as rowdy and chaotic,Flynn proposed more drastic measures.

Trump should plan for every eventuality,Flynn told conservative political websiteNewsmax,"because we cannot allow this election and the integrity of our elections to go away".

Trump has lost before judges of both political parties,including some he appointed. And some of his strongest rebukes have come from conservative Republicans. The Supreme Court has also refused to take up two cases — decisions that Trump has scorned.

The new case is at least the fourth involving Pennsylvania that Trump’s campaign or Republican allies have taken to the Supreme Court in a bid to overturn Biden’s victory in the state or at least reverse court decisions involving mail-in balloting. Many more cases were filed in state and federal courts.

Roughly 10,000 mail-in ballots that arrived after polls closed but before a state court-ordered deadline remain in limbo,awaiting the highest court’s decision on whether they should be counted.

The Trump campaign’s filing on Sunday appears to target three decisions of Pennsylvania’s Democratic-majority state Supreme Court.

In November,the state’s highest court upheld a Philadelphia judge’s ruling that state law only required election officials to allow partisan observers to be able to see mail-in ballots being processed,not stand close enough to election workers to see the writing on individual envelopes.

It also ruled that more than 8300 mail-in ballots in Philadelphia that had been challenged by the Trump campaign because of minor technical errors — such as a voter’s failure to write their name,address or date on the outer ballot envelope — should be counted. In October,the court ruled unanimously that counties are prohibited from rejecting mail-in ballots simply because a voter’s signature does not resemble the signature on the person’s voter registration form.

The Pennsylvania Republican Party has a pending petition on the state's mail-in-ballot deadline in which the party specifically says in its appeal that it recognises the issue will not affect the outcome of the 2020 election.

Trump Biden 2020

Understand the election result and its aftermath with expert analysis from US correspondent Matthew Knott. Sign up toThe Sydney MorningHerald's newsletterhere,The Age'shere,Brisbane Times'here andWAtoday'shere.