Former Hawks coach Alastair Clarkson.

Former Hawks coach Alastair Clarkson.Credit:Getty

But the Hawks’ major objective has been to ensure that the Clarkson payout - which embarrassed the club when he moved on earlier than planned - did not cause them to shed football jobs or compromise their football operations under Mitchell,who is obviously not remunerated at anything like the level of four-time premiership coach Clarkson.

The entire payout (not counting any entitlements) was counted in this year’s financial position,reducing the club’s profit from over $1m to $255,474.

The Hawks say they have re-jigged their football department to ensure that the payout - which is allowed to be spread over three years - does not hinder them from spending on football in 2022 and 2023. Next year,the soft cap will rise slightly to about $6.5m.

Hawthorn’s revamped post-Clarkson football department will allocate more resources to development,in a reflection of their younger list profile and greater investment in the draft. Their coaching numbers will increase by one.

Hawthorn chief executive Justin Reeves said the club had accounted for Clarkson’s payout in the 2021 financial year,which ended on October 31.

“We dealt with all this financially in the year just over,” he said.

Advertisement
Loading

“There will be no impact to our football program in 2021-22. We’re confident there will be no or minimal tax moving forward.”

Under the AFL’s socialised regime,clubs that exceed the soft cap pay a fine or tax of 75 cents in the dollar if they exceed the cap by less than $100,000 in a given season.

But this tax rises steeply once clubs exceed the soft cap by more than $100,000 in more than one season,ballooning to fines of150 and then 250 per cent if they go over the cap by between $100,000 and $250,000 in a second and third season,and much more if they go over by $250,000-plus. Clubs have been unwilling to spend much over the soft cap since its introduction.

Most Viewed in Sport

Loading