In Washington,a senior administration official,briefing reporters shortly after Putin’s news conference,seemed to contradict Putin,saying that no date or place had yet been set for negotiations. But he said the Biden administration was willing to begin discussions with Moscow in January,as long as they cover Russian provocations such as the troop movements to the Ukrainian border.

US intelligence agencies have said Russia has tens of thousands of troops near the Ukrainian border,with plans to amass an invasion force of up to 175,000 soldiers.

Putin’s positive framing of anticipated talks with the US seemed to suggest that a Russian attack over the Ukrainian border was not imminent. But American intelligence officials have said in recent weeks that if Putin plans to attack — a decision they do not believe he has made — he would not be ready until later in January,when more of his troops have amassed and the ground has frozen. Russia’s heavy armor could sink in the muddy territory until a hard freeze,they noted.

Sam Charap,a Russian security analyst at Rand,said he was becoming increasingly convinced that the Russian push for negotiations was meant to buy time for possible military action.

“I just don’t see negotiations on these big-picture documents capable of producing results on the time frame that is being suggested,” Charap said.

He said the cost of a large-scale military buildup means Putin will need to make a decision soon. “You can’t just keep this number of forces at this high readiness outside of garrison for months and months and months,” Charap said.

Wait and watch

Whatever Putin’s intentions,American officials say they are rallying European allies for coordinated sanctions that would snap into place as soon as military action began. It is not clear,however,that the threat of such penalties would impress Putin,who has noted that Russia has lived with Western sanctions for years.

American and European officials are also continuing to monitor cyberattacks and disinformation campaigns that they say may be preparing the battlefield for any action. The senior administration official noted that such action has “often been done in advance these of sorts of incursions in the past”. The disinformation campaign has attempted to create a narrative that Ukraine is the country provoking a conflict.

In another sign of Western engagement,Valery Gerasimov,Russia’s top military commander,spoke with his British counterpart,Sir Tony Radakin,on Thursday,and with Mark Milley,chair of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff,on Wednesday.

But in a move underscoring the continuing tensions,Russia on Thursday (Friday AEDT) announced snap paratrooper exercises in and around Crimea,the Black Sea peninsula annexed from Ukraine in 2014.

In his assertions about bringing missiles “to our home,” Putin appeared to be referring to missile-defence systems in Poland and Romania. He has alleged that the systems can be used for offensive purposes and could soon be installed in Ukraine. Western officials deny those claims,noting that missile interceptors are,by definition,used only to repel incoming attacks.

American officials say removing missile defences from NATO countries would undercut European security. They also say they will continue to arm Ukraine with defensive weaponry,including Javelin missiles used against Russian tanks. But because Ukraine is not a NATO member,NATO does not keep antimissile defences or nuclear weapons there.

A freewheeling conference

The freewheeling news conference was a stark demonstration of the Kremlin’s image-making of Putin as an all-around expert and benevolent leader — a “good czar” keeping local officials in check while steering the world’s biggest country. The lengthy session,meant to display Putin’s authority and stamina,included a range of questions on far-flung topics including “cancel culture” and Father Frost,Russia’s version of Santa Claus.

Putin has rarely ventured out of his cocoon of social distancing since the pandemic’s start,and this was the first time in two years that he had faced such a large crowd of journalists. The several hundred in attendance had to pass through a disinfectant mist to enter the news conference hall just outside the Kremlin wall,and they were seated no closer than about 50 feet from the President.

Reporters held up signs and shouted to get Putin’s attention. A popular YouTube host asked Putin about new evidence of widespread torture in Russian prisons,to which he responded that such abuse was a “global problem,” including in the United States and France. A journalist for the BBC’s Russian-language service asked aboutlast year’s poisoning of the imprisoned leader Alexei Navalny. Putin once again claims that the West had failed to provide any evidence.

“Let’s turn this page,” Putin said.

As usual,many other questions sought Putin’s help on local issues such as central heating problems in the Altai region and World War II sites in need of funds in the city formerly known as Stalingrad.

There were only three questions related to Ukraine. Asked for a “realistic prognosis” of whether Russians could expect a war this winter,Putin laid out a historical justification for possible use of force,going back more than 100 years.

He argued that lands that should be seen as historically part of Russia were included in the Soviet-era boundaries of Ukraine. After the Soviet breakup,Putin said,Moscow acquiesced to their loss,so long as Ukraine was neutral. But he said Russia could not tolerate foreign militaries to be based in these areas.

“They are creating on this territory an anti-Russia,constantly sending over modern weapons and brainwashing the population,” Putin said. “Can you imagine how Russia is to live like this from a historical perspective,always looking over our shoulders at what new weapon systems have been provided over there?”

This article originally appeared inThe New York Times.