IBAC Commissioner Robert Redlich has defended the agency’s handling of witnesses.Credit:AAP
The Victorian opposition,former Labor minister Adem Somyurek and other commentators have questioned IBAC’s independence over its decision to interview Andrews in private hearings as part of Operations Watts and Sandon.
“There’s a profound misunderstanding within the public domain,” Redlich told a parliamentary inquiry on Monday.
“We are treated as though we are a royal commission,so that once a subject matter of an investigation has been identified,the assumption is that any public hearing will involve calling all of the relevant evidence that relates to that subject matter.”
IBAC tends to hold public hearings only if it has strong evidence of alleged wrongdoing.
Loading
Under its act,when questioning witnesses in public,the commission must be satisfied there are reasonable grounds to conclude the witness has acted corruptly,or that it is in the public interest to examine the witness publicly and that no unreasonable damage will be done to their reputation.
Last month The Age revealedAndrews had been secretly grilled by IBAC as part of Operation Watts investigating Labor MPs’ misuse of public resources.The Australian last week revealed Andrews was questioned privately as part of Operation Sandon,which is investigating alleged corrupt land deals in Casey.