The Sydney Morning Herald andThe Age contacted dozens of business leaders,most of whom declined to stick their heads above the parapet to argue for what they believe should be the priorities of the next federal government. During a federal election,company chief executives,chairmen and women,and business groups usually steer clear of politics. As the Nobel Prize winning economist Milton Friedman said:“The business of business is business.”
Loading
A number of Australian companies even go as far as having a rule of not commenting on election promises and policies during the election campaign. Companies are cautious knowing that showing partisan support for one party is a gamble,especially if that party doesn’t end up winning office. Another reason is that companies don’t want to alienate customers,staff,or shareholders by entering the political fray,except on issues where there has been widespread community support,such as same-sex marriage,climate change or wages growth.
Higher Costs
Peter Shergold,who was the head of prime minister and cabinet in the Howard government,also says the nation has to increase migration in the short term. “Australia still depends for its economic growth and development on large-scale recruitment of labour from overseas. We need to think:what is the appropriate balance that we need between permanent and temporary migration? And how can we do it in a way that is not perceived as a short circuit to investing as we should in our own education and skills training?”
Shergold says it’s the first time in three generations that Australia has not had mass migration. He wants to see a greater opportunity for temporary migrants to progress to become permanent residents,and also for the university and TAFE sectors to become integrated. While Australia needs more science graduates,Shergold says it also needs more people willing to work in aged care and childcare.
A tight labour market has pushed up wages,which has taken centre stage in the federal election campaign alongside the cost of living and interest rate rises.
In the RBA’s May Statement on Monetary Policy,it revealed that more than half of the companies surveyed expected to pay wage increases above 3 per cent over the year ahead because of the tight labour market. Companies such asWoolworths have supported an increase in retail workers’ wages in line with underlying inflation. The Australian Council of Trade Unions has called for a minimum wage increase of 5 per cent.
CommSec’s chief economist Craig James says without an upsurge in migration it will be hard to fill job vacancies,and expects businesses will either start looking at working existing employees harder or restructuring to prioritise what work they can and can’t do. “If you’re paying 3.5 per cent wage increases,and you want inflation at 2.5 per cent,the difference between those two has got to be productivity. Otherwise,companies will go backwards,they’re not getting the return. They’re paying out 3.5 per cent growth on wages,and getting 2.5 per cent on price.”
Shepherd says the inability to fill jobs will lead to higher costs,in areas such as wages,and Australia’s competitiveness declining. Both sides of politics have promised to review the migration levels.
Loading
Australia’s growing wage pressures come after a decade of low wage growth,where real wages have declined. Across the world’s richest countries,there is a trend of wages growth and rising prices for goods. This has added to inflationary pressures in the global economy already caused by a disruption to factory production and supply chains fromCOVID-19 restrictions in countries such as China,and a spike in oil prices triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Central banks around the world have been lifting interest rates in an effort to curb inflation,which could dampen spending and investment by business. Still,some business leaders such as Macquarie Group chief executive Shemara Wikramanayake remain optimistic. She believes the economy will remain resilient despite the threat of rising interest rates and inflation,saying the trends of decarbonisation and digitisation will drive strong business investment.
Lunatic Fringe
Diane Smith Gander,a director of Australia’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases AGL,also wants the next federal government to prioritise securing a unified national approach to decarbonise the economy,arguing there has already been a lost decade on federal public policy in this area.
“Everyone agrees with climate change science now,apart from a small group,which you might describe as the lunatic fringe,” says Smith-Gander. “We need to find a way to step towards a swifter decarbonisation of the economy,and support to ensure that it’s done in a just way and an orderly way,which maintains energy affordability for Australian households so that Australians continue to support the push to decarbonisation.”
AGL is the subject of an activist investor campaign by billionaireMike Cannon-Brookes,who opposes a plan to split the company,and has criticised its failure to move towards decarbonisation more quickly.
Smith-Gander believes whichever side of politics wins on May 21 will have a strong mandate to act on decarbonising the economy. CommSec’s chief economist Craig James agrees:“Any government coming in at ground zero,whether Labor or the existing government,this is the time when you can do things. You have to take the opportunity from early on in your term and provide leadership.”
It’s a view also shared by Shepherd. “It comes down to leadership and policy. Business is pragmatic. They will work with anybody.”
The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories,exclusive coverage and expert opinion.Sign up to get it every weekday morning.