Three decades laterGame of Thrones,produced for television,was transformative for the genre. It lowered those barriers to entry. A bit ofDallas meetsDungeons&Dragons,it was political and theatrical,without being either fantastical or ridiculous. Suddenly,theBreaking Bad andBorgen crowd were staying in to watch Joffrey,Jamie and Daenerys.
So,House of the Dragon comes to market as a fairly elegant package. Set almost 200 years beforeGame of Thrones,it presents a far simpler political paradigm. UnlikeThrones,which was a web of feuding royal houses and complex relationships,House of the Dragon has but one,House Targaryen,those white-haired wielders of draconic power.
Here,House Targaryen is at its giddy political height. The well-meaning but feeble King Viserys (Paddy Considine) sits on the Iron Throne,with no heir except his daughter Rhaenyra (Australian Milly Alcock),whom the misogynistic court will not accept,and his brother,the ambitious and excessive Daemon (Matt Smith).
In the shadow of the king stands Ser Otto Hightower (Rhys Ifans),the charmless palace chamberlain,who plots not just to cement his own place in the unfolding history of Westeros,but to ensure that Prince Daemon’s power is kept in check. Will he succeed? Will Westeros be torn asunder? You don’t need to have watched all 73 episodes ofGame of Thrones to guess how it ends.
Game of Thrones was steered creatively by David Benioff and D. B. Weiss who,to be fair,delivered a less-than-perfect pilot,seven cracking good seasons and a final season that sent everyone’s hair as white as a Targaryen’s.House of the Dragon has a different lineage:director/producer Miguel Sapochnik,who worked onGame of Thrones,and Ryan J. Condal,something of the franchise’s Luke Skywalker to author George R. R. Martin’s Yoda.