Where you draw the line on what a salary dump is,and what is a regular trade,would be debatable,as often a traded player can take revised lower terms at a new club,or have a large portion of his contract paid by his club to play elsewhere.

Potentially,a demarcation line would be based on whether the recipient club gives up a worse pick than the one they are receiving for taking on a big contract.

For instance,Tom Mitchell and Brodie Grundy were not technically salary dumps,even though their two original clubs are paying a chunk of their salaries to play elsewhere in future,because in both cases Hawthorn and Collingwood received more compensation in draft picks than they gave up.

The AFL is not committed to making this change,but it is a tweak they will consider based on feedback from clubs.

Troubled by players leaving clubs,especially in emerging markets,to move early in their careers,as well as regard for the inflationary effect of massive salary demands from second-year players for their first unregulated contracts,the AFL will explore whether the initial player contract could,or should,be extended from two to three years,possibly only for first and second round draftees.

Any change to this would be difficult and require the involvement,and agreement,of the AFL Players’ Association.

Keep up to date with the best AFL coverage in the country.Sign up for the Real Footy newsletter.