At the time,White’s lawyers unsuccessfully applied to have the plea withdrawn,with Justice Helen Wilson observing he had been “clear and emphatic”,and despite suffering from anxiety and an intellectual disability was found to be fit to plead.
But on Tuesday,White’s barrister Tim Game,SC,told the Court of Criminal Appeal his client had made a “plea of convenience” without fully grasping what he was admitting to.
“This is not some kind of straightforward case where the accused could have understood what he was pleading to,” he said. “The Crown did not say our case is x,our case is y”,he said.
Loading
Game said White had maintained he did not kill Johnson intentionally or with reckless indifference,which must be established to prove murder.
“It’s the Crown that has to identify the legal case for liability and they haven’t done it,they haven’t even begun to do it.”
On the contrary,Game said,there was confession evidence that White said he had “tried to grab” Johnson as he fell – which would contradict the murder charge,he argued.