It is an unwise move. Twitter depends on the journalists and political tragics,especially in English-speaking markets,to post on its platform. There is no sign that Australian media outlets would stump up almost $400 per journalist annually to have them verified.
Senior sources sayThe Guardianis unconvinced. Nine,which ownsThe Sydney Morning Herald,The AgeandThe Australian Financial Reviewalong with its TV news operations,isn’t interested either. A source at the ABC was equally blunt when asked if the national broadcaster would pay. “No,” they said.
And Peter Fray,editor-in-chief of the smaller news site Crikey,gave a vague but sceptical analogy:“[Social media] is a bit of smorgasbord,” Fray said. “Would you pay an extra $20 for the jumbo prawn that already turned out to be a shrimp?”
Loading
It would be equally foolish to forecast a mass exodus from Twitter,despite the headlines suggesting Musk’s ownership and libertarian bent have already spurred a wave of celebritiesto leave. The lists of those who have left are anaemic. The women’s magazineCosmopolitancounted five. US broadcaster NBC had nine,with no genuine A-listers.
The reality is that Twitter has not been a platform for movie stars and models for years;the platform is not visual enough to compete with TikTok or Instagram. Justin Bieber’s 113 million followers hardly ever see a post from the singer.
Instead,Twitter relies on “heavy tweeters”,the 10 per cent of users who generate 90 per cent of tweets and half the company’s revenue.