UNSW Professor Megan Davis said the Voice to Parliament would deliver substantive practical change,whereas changing the date of Australia Day was a symbolic move.Credit:Alex Ellinghausen
Davis,a Cobble Cobble woman and co-chair of the Uluru Dialogue,said there would be no official,coordinated effort by the Yes movement to campaign alongside the Invasion rallies or tap into the mass public support for “changing the date” that accompanies Australia Day.
She said January 26 was a solemn day for many Indigenous Australians and,while some supported changing the date,“there’s a very strong view that changing the day doesn’t change the issue”.
“My greatest reservation about the ‘change the date’ movements is that,in the absence of any structural reform,you’re changing the date but you’re not changing the structural powerlessness,” Davis,a professor of law at UNSW,said.
“Supporting ‘change the date’ is fine,but really supporting the referendum and the Voice to Parliament is something that’s actually going to make a difference on the ground. It’s a tactile reform. So if changing the date comes after that,that makes a lot of sense,but to change the date without any substantive reform,it’s a symbolic move.”
She said the Voice to Parliament - which seeks to enshrine in the constitution a body to advise parliament and the executive on matters affecting First Nations people - would involve Indigenous people within Australia’s democratic system “in a way that they haven’t been up till now”,while changing the date was a “warm and fuzzy notion of reconciliation”.
While thousands attended Invasion day protests last year in Sydney,Brisbane,Perth and Adelaide,marches in Melbourne and Hobart were cancelled due to concern over rising COVID infection numbers. This year there are dozens of rallies,concerts and marches across the nation calling for the national day’s date to be changed.