A reference group will be set up to advise the government on the investment mandate before the board is appointed and the chief executive is named.
Loading
Deputy Opposition Leader Sussan Ley labelled the fund a dud on Tuesday after the Coalition party room formally decided to vote against the bill,with the discussion dominated by concerns over debt.
“Labor’s National Reconstruction Fund fails to address the issues our manufacturers need the government to show leadership on – high energy prices,disrupted supply chains and acute labour shortages,” Ley said.
The Coalition is yet to take a formal position on the $10 billion housing fund,but the concern about debt could lead to a similar rejection at the next party room meeting.
Senate independent David Pocock is seeking changes to the housing fund after expressing doubt that it would be big enough to finance 30,000 new homes,the government’s key claim.
Greens housing spokesman Max Chandler-Mather said the shortage of social housing might grow during the life of the new fund because it would not do enough.
As with the manufacturing fund,the government will set the return for the housing fund in an investment mandate it is yet to release.
Husic said he wanted the manufacturing fund to start backing projects with debt and equity from July 1,but he did not guarantee the same rate of return as the Clean Energy Finance Corporation – the $10 billion fund that has to generate an average return that is 1 percentage point higher than the Commonwealth bond rate.
“They’re targeting different activities – the NRF is not just looking at renewables,” he said when asked if the rate of return would be the same for the new fund.
“We’re looking at the value-add in resources and in agriculture,we’re looking at critical technologies like quantum computing and artificial intelligence and robotics,we’re looking at medical sciences,transport and defence.
Loading
“We want the reference group to guide us on that,but our expectation is that a return will be delivered to the Commonwealth.”
Husic met US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo in Washington DC last week to discuss joint work on advanced technology but noted concerns in the European Union about the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act and the scale of its subsidies for US companies at the expense of overseas competitors.
“The initial reaction would be that it provides competition and it might lure firms offshore,but I think it represents a great opportunity for Australia because we’ve got great working relationships with America and we share an interest in certain areas like green tech.
“This could be potentially a bonanza for Australian industry.”
The manufacturing fund is expected to put $3 billion towards low-emissions technology and $1 billion into projects that add value to resources,with battery manufacturing a target for funding because Australia produces the raw materials used in batteries for electric vehicles and household energy storage.
Cut through the noise of federal politics with news,views and expert analysis from Jacqueline Maley.Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter here.