The Voice’s ability to advise the executive branch – that is,ministers and the public service – has been furiously opposed by some constitutional conservatives and lawyers on the grounds it would hamstring government decision-making by creating an avenue for High Court litigation if the Voice was not properly consulted.
Constitutional expert Anne Twomey,who will give evidence at Friday’s hearing,said the inquiry was the first time the public could learn about the debate over the wording in public.
Twomey has argued in her submission to the inquiry that the High Court would not draw the implication that the advice of the Voice must be listened to by the government,as feared by some conservatives.
But she said it would be a positive thing if the committee came up with an additional set of words to ameliorate the concerns of conservatives without diminishing the power of the Voice.“We need to be open to that kind of discussion,” she said in an interview.
The committee chair,Labor MP Nita Green,told the ABC some matters related to the draft wording deserved scrutiny but there were other concerns that were “really unnecessary[and] designed to bring[the Voice] down.”
Loading
Victorian Liberal MP Keith Wolahan,deputy chair,said its focus must be on identifying constitutional risk in the wording.
“We all have a duty to approach that task in good faith and with an open mind. It may be the last chance to prioritise meaningful compromise,” he said.
Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney said on Wednesday the government would listen to concerns about the amendment,but added that “many constitutional lawyers say that the words that we’ve ended up with are very sound.”
As speculation mounted on Thursday about Price’s possible promotion,five Liberal MPs,who asked not to be named so they could speak freely,told this masthead that she would be a good choice for the post of shadow minister for Indigenous Australians.
But two other MPs said it was more likely that Dutton would promote her to a special envoy or assistant minister’s role because she has been in parliament for less than a year,with a specific brief to campaign against the Voice.
At present,the Nationals have six of 22 posts in the shadow cabinet,which is proportionally more than they are entitled to,and promoting Price would take that number to seven posts and potentially trigger disquiet in the Liberal Party.
Nationals leader David Littleproud warned he would not surrender any frontbench positions to make way for the prominent Voice opponent.
“There will be no change in our shadow cabinet line-up,we are settled. I am more than happy with our shadow cabinet line-up,” he said.
Loading
Shadow ministers Michaelia Cash,Paul Fletcher and Michael Sukkar are being discussed as options to take over the shadow attorney-general’s post,while shadow health minister Anne Ruston could take post of Indigenous Australians spokeswoman.
Dutton is expected to take the weekend to consider how to reshuffle his deck and announce the changes no sooner than Monday.
Earlier on Thursday,Price said she and Dutton had discussed her taking on the Indigenous Australians portfolio.
“It certainly has come up in discussion. It can’t not come up in discussion with these current circumstances,” she told Sky News.
Price,Fletcher,Cash,Sukkar,Ruston and Dutton were contacted for comment.
A series of key pro-Voice Indigenous figures will give evidence at the hearing in Canberra,including professor Marcia Langton,unionist Thomas Mayor,professor Megan Davis,Indigenous elder Pat Anderson and Professor Tom Calma.
A group of jurists will also appear to give expert legal advice. They include constitutional expert Greg Craven,who has expressed strong views about the need to limit the Voice’s power,barrister Louise Clegg,former judge Kenneth Hayne,KC,constitutional silk Bret Walker and academic George Williams.
Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis from Jacqueline Maley.Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter here.