“There have been no changes to commitments on intermodal facilities in the 2023-24 federal budget,and the Albanese government will continue working co-operatively with the Victorian government on the funding and delivery arrangements for[Truganina],” a spokeswoman for King said.
The Andrews government has made no commitment for the Beveridge site and prioritised the west,setting aside $6.1 million for planning in last year’s state budget,but it believes both terminals would eventually be needed.
The projects became a flashpoint during the 2022 federal election when Labor and the Coalition diverged on whether the north or the west – two growth areas crying out for more secure jobs – should take precedence.
King last year accused the Coalition of making a“fake commitment” for $1.62 billion to build in Beveridge and of announcing a litany of “press release projects” she claimed the then Morrison government had no intention of pursuing.
Loading
Melbourne’s existing hub,which does not support double-stacked trains,will close after 2030.
Rod Hannifey,president of the National Road Freighters Association,who prefers Truganina for the interstate terminal,said a second review was an opportunity to consult after Inland Rail was botched so badly.
“Do a lousy job,and then we’re stuck with it for the next 50 to 100 years,and it’s too late,money wasted,” he said. “But realistically,they’ve got to decide and make a plan and stick with it.”
State opposition spokeswoman for freight Roma Britnell said the Andrews government should be pressuring federal Labor to get on with the ventures,and accused state Labor of focusing on spin rather than getting freight off roads.
“The talk has not resulted in an outcome as yet,and I think a decade is a long time.”
She said progress had been slow on parts of the Port Rail Shuttle Network,which would move 30 per cent of containers across Melbourne by rail,and the mode-shift incentive scheme needed to be enhanced.
Infrastructure experts have welcomed the review of all projects,which exempts election commitments and those too far into construction,particularly while capacity is constrained by labour and supply shortages.
A Victorian government spokeswoman said the state understood the need for both terminals but its priority was in the west. “We’ve been clear that we’ll need new intermodal terminals both in Melbourne’s west and in Beveridge to deliver better outcomes for Victorian businesses and the community – but our priority is to see[Truganina] built first.”
The Morning Edition newsletter is our guide to the day’s most important and interesting stories,analysis and insights.Sign up here.