Modi delivered most of his speech in Hindi,driving home what was already obvious:this was a political event for an Indian audience. Within a year,Modi will be standing for re-election. Our PM had walked straight into it. And he was loving it.
The imbalance was plain – the event was as surreal as Albanese going to Mumbai in an election year and holding an ALP rally. When Albanese did visit India this year,he and Modi were driven around Modi’s personal cricket stadium in what looked like a motorised shoe. In India,Albanese was at a Modi event;in Sydney,another Modi event.
Following protocol,Australia’s disposition was traditionally bipartisan. At Homebush,one row back from Albanese was Peter Dutton. Albanese’s discussions with Modi aimed at improving trade and migration agreements while steering clear of the faux pas of questioning the BJP party’s record on human rights or India’s implicit support of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Australia’s eager-to-please behaviour highlighted the asymmetry of the relationship. Australia was not setting the terms. Modi,meanwhile,was unafraid to make suggestions on internal Australian affairs,gaining Albanese’s consent to take “strict actions” against anyone attacking Hindu temples in Australia. This referred to separatist and anti-Modi graffiti written on temples in Melbourne,Sydney and Brisbane this year.
There had been no question of Australia – or actually,state police not in Albanese’s jurisdiction – being anything other than strict in response. Several public figurescondemned the attacks.TheTimes of India reported Modi urging Albanese to make “the safety of the Indian community a special priority for him”. Modi’s message was for domestic Indian consumption,emphasising Modi’s ability to have Albanese – who does not run state police and had never shown any sign of tolerance of these acts – say what Modi wants him to say.
It was hard not to stand back and appreciate the contrast. On the one hand,Australia is silent on India’s persecution of ethnic minorities,its imprisonment of human rights activists,the prospective jailing of theleader of its largest opposition party,its global leadership in internetshutdowns and its targeted political censorship,amid a long list of anti-democraticactivities listed by Human Rights Watch and other organisations,not to mention itsneutrality on Putin’s war in Ukraine. On the other hand,The Boss can raise the graffiti-ing of temples and receive warm reassurances that we will do better.