The No case claims the Voice is “legally risky” and will divide Australians in the Constitution.

The No case claims the Voice is “legally risky” and will divide Australians in the Constitution.Credit:Marija Ercegovac

Australians will head to the polls in October to vote in the first referendum since 1999. This is what you need to know about the Voice to parliament.See all7stories.

The No case details 10 reasons why its campaigners believe constitutional change to enshrine an Indigenous Voice to parliament should be rejected. The No pamphlet was steered by Coalition MPs and led by Indigenous frontbencher Jacinta Nampijinpa Price. It twice declares:“if you don’t know,vote No”.

The No pamphlet claims the Voice is “legally risky” and will divide Australians in the Constitution. It tells voters:“You are being asked to vote to change our Constitution without details.”

‌The Yes pamphlet annotated here

Cut through the noise of federal politics with news,views and expert analysis from Jacqueline Maley. Subscribers can sign up to our weeklyInside Politics newsletter here.

Most Viewed in Politics

Loading