The advice on timing changed on Wednesday morning.

The government plan is to hear from about 70 speakers in the condolence motion and then take a short break late in the afternoon before resuming for the debate on the detention laws at 6.30pm. The government appears to want them passed by 9pm.

‘If these laws are introduced back into the house today to be voted on,it will be a complete perversion of our democracy.’

Independent MP Kylea Tink

“If these laws are introduced back into the house today to be voted on,it will be a complete perversion of our democracy and Australians have to stand up and demand that our proper democratic processes are respected and carried through,” said Tink,who had scheduled a day of meetings with her constituents on Wednesday.

Independent MP Zoe Daniel,who represents Goldstein in Melbourne,is in Canberra but unimpressed with the sudden change.

“The government needs to stop giving into the opposition’s default position of the politics of fear and make careful law on matters which have profound and important consequences for community safety,but also human rights and the nature of Australian citizenship,” Daniel said.

“To force the house to vote on legislation with no warning,no debate,in the dead of night is the tail wagging the dog and is absolutely not the politics done differently that this government promised.”

Andrew Wilkie from Clark in Tasmania and Kate Chaney from Curtin in Perth may not be able to take part in the vote.

The independent member for Mayo in South Australia,Rebekha Sharkie,said she was told on Tuesday the vote on the detention law would be held on Thursday.

“For me this whole process has been clumsy,” she said.

“Assurances were given yesterday afternoon the earliest debate for the migration bill would be tomorrow. This makes a mockery of the parliament really and disrespectful of members who do not live close by.”

Wilkie,a crossbencher during the Gillard government as well as nine years of Coalition government,said the rushed law was “one of the most shocking disregards of proper parliamentary process” he had seen.

“A number of members will likely be absent from any debate and vote on what are obviously very important matters,” he said. “And all for a political fix to deny the Opposition a little more time to beat the government up over the fallout from the High Court decision.”

Sophie Scamps,the independent for Mackellar on the northern beaches of Sydney,said MPs had been told by the government that Wednesday was to be used for the condolence motion for Murphy.

“Now we have been told at the last minute that the government plans to introduce its migration detention amendments today,” she said. “As independents,we take our responsibility to understand legislation before we vote for it very seriously. This sort of rushed process is undemocratic.”

Independent MP Zali Steggall,who represents Warringah in Sydney,said the damage from the move was greater for those who represented Australians further away from Canberra.

“Springing these votes on parliament with no notice this evening is not only disrespectful but also sends a message to constituents in seats further than a short flight or drive to Canberra that their voice doesn’t matter,” she said.

Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek told ABC’sRN Breakfast on Wednesday morning the stronger laws needed to pass through the lower house in order to protect the community.

“I can say to the community that community safety is our government’s first priority,and that’s why we’ve got the Border Force and AFP[Australian Federal Police] operation,that’s why we put a quarter of a billion dollars into these agencies to make sure that they’ve got the tools they need to keep Australians safe,” Plibersek said.

Coalition frontbencher Simon Birmingham denied the opposition was trying to create fear in the community to score political points from the government.

“We have had these terrible incidents take place,and is why the government has been negligent at every step[of this],” he said.

Greens leader Adam Bandt said the government was creating a two-tiered legal system.

“In Australia,we have a system if you commit a crime,you serve your sentence. After that,if you do anything else wrong,you can get arrested and taken before the court,” Bandt said on ABC television on Wednesday morning.

“What the government and the Liberals are proposing is to go further and start talking about legislation that says if you might commit a crime in the future,can you get locked up.

“That’s treating people born in another country in a different way to the way we run the legal system here in Australia. And that’s why legal experts have raised real concerns about this.”

Cut through the noise of federal politics with news,views and expert analysis from Jacqueline Maley. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletterhere.