It took some time for the G7 (plus Australia) sanctions on Russian oil to bite,which enabled Russia to not only generate a lot of income during the early phase of the war but,as the sanctions and the $US60 a barrel price cap on its oil exports started to gain traction,assemble its “grey armada” of ageing tankers that has increasingly enabled it to circumvent the sanctions.
That has,however,come at a cost. The acquisition and operating costs of the fleet it has assembled,and the longer shipping routes to the Chinese and Indian buyers who have replaced European buyers as Russia’s major customers,have added,according to US Treasury,about $US36 a barrel to Russia’s costs.
China and India,as the only substantial buyers of Russian oil,have also been able to demand significant discounts,further reducing the net proceeds from Russia’s oil sales.
In that sense,even though more than half Russia’s oil exports in recent months have been at prices above the cap,the sanctions have worked to materially reduce Russia’s revenues from them. Russia’s central bank has said that the revenues of the country’s largest oil and gas producers were 41 per cent lower in the first nine months of this year than for the same period of 2022.
The new package of sanctions,apart from new EU and G7 measures designedto ban imports of Russian diamonds which,if effective,could deprive Russia of about $6.5 billion a year of revenue,include efforts to tighten the sanctions on oil exports.
Loading
The EU will more closely monitor the sales of tankers to third countries,with more detailed documentation required and tougher action planned against third countries helping Russia evade the sanctions.
Senior US Treasury department officials are in Europe this week to discuss further efforts to tighten the enforcement of the price caps.
If the EU,US and others are able to squeeze Russia’s oil revenues even harder,it would add to the pressure on Russia’s economy and its ability to both sustain the war effort while maintaining domestic social stability.
Other new EU sanctions on imports of raw materials for steel production and processed aluminium and other metals and export bans on advanced technological and industrial goods,machinery and software are aimed at both choking Russia’s revenue and denying it access to dual-use technologies that might aid its war efforts.
There’s also been considerable discussion within the EU about using some of the $US300 billion ($447 billion) of the Russian foreign exchange reserves that the West froze at the onset of the war,or at least the earnings on them,as a source of financial aid for Ukraine.
Russia’s finances are stretched,with the Kremlin forced to impose ad hoc revenue-raising efforts,like the large “voluntary contributions” – levies – imposed on both domestic businesses and international companies trying to exit Russia. Those levies are becoming an increasingly important proportion of the government’s revenue base and a source of angst forRussia’s oligarchs.
There’s no relief in sight. The cost of the war continues to ratchet up,with spending consistently and substantially outstripped the budgeted amounts.
Russia’s commitment to OPEC+ production cuts – 300,000 barrels a day of oil and 200,000 barrels a day of refined product – is likely to put even more pressure on the revenue base,especially given that those cutshave so far failed to raise the oil price against a backdrop of weaker demand.
Loading
Given that Putin has confirmed (surprise,surprise) that he will againstand for re-election for the presidency next year,there will be pressure on the government to both sustain the war and keep ordinary Russians,if not happy,then at least calm.
If the West can keep Ukraine competitive in the conflict while broadening and deepening the range of sanctions and strengthening their enforcement,it might ultimately be able to force the Putin regime to have to choose between its militaristic ambitions and ensuring that its population doesn’t become restless as the impact of the war on their standards of living becomes increasingly obvious.