This masthead has spoken to six other sources within the government,none of whom were in the meeting but all of whom had been told what was discussed,and all six agreed that Foster had indicated she would not provide a written answer to Paterson’s question.
Loading
Rather than tabling written answers early in the day,Foster was expected to provide verbal answers later in the day,during “outcome 3” of the hearings,at about 4.30pm.
Instead,the document was tabled just after 9.30am.
Five of the seven sources this masthead spoke to said it remained unclear why the plan that Foster had outlined during the pre-estimates meeting had changed.
They did not suggest malice or misbehaviour from Foster,a senior public servant with more than three decades of experience,and said there may have been a simple misunderstanding.
“She blindsided the entire government and infuriated ministers,” one of them said.
“It put us on the back foot immediately. The plan was it would be released later in the afternoon,she didn’t have to do it so quickly but suddenly,they[the opposition] had all this information. Tactically it was the wrong thing to do.”
The behind-the-scenes turmoil has raised fresh questions about Home Affairs,a department that has been embroiled in several recent scandals and which minister Clare O’Neil has sought to reform,including by appointing Foster to replace sacked secretary Michael Pezzullo.
Foster is due to appear again before the Senate committee on Wednesday and is expected to face further questions about the NZYQ decision,as well as the tensions between her and her two portfolio ministers.
She will then appear alongside O’Neil at a conference in early April at the Australian National University and is expected to outline details of how she plans to reform the sprawling department.
O’Neil has called four inquiries into aspects of Home Affairs work:the Nixon review into failures to deal with visa fraud and human trafficking;the Richardson probe into failures in the management of offshore detention procurement;the Parkinson report into the migration system;and the Briggs investigation into Pezzullo’s misconduct.
The inquiries have all created political headaches for Labor.
As one of the seven sources said,Home Affairs was “the biggest problem the government has,Pezzullo papered over the cracks with his brashness but the evidence is there. It’s a dumpster fire”.
In response to a series of detailed questions to Foster,a spokesperson for the Department of Home Affairs said only that “Ms Foster tabled the document you refer to at approximately 9.38am on Monday,12 February 2024 in response to a request from Senator Paterson”.
Loading
“Ms Foster meets regularly with ministers to discuss a range of matters that impact the department and its functions. The department does not comment on the content of those discussions.”
In response to the same questions,a spokesperson for Giles and O’Neil said:“The opposition requested the tabling of a document. The document was tabled”.
“The government argued strongly against the decision of the High Court. Our number one priority in responding has been,and will continue to be,community safety.”
Cut through the noise of federal politics with news,views and expert analysis.Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter.