Shein is countersuing The Iconic,arguing the Australian-founded retailer doesn’t own the “Dazie” trademark.
But in documents filed to the Federal Court obtained by this masthead,Shein pointed to instances where other businesses had sold clothing under “Daisy” or similar names – such as “Daisy Clothing”,“Daisy Dance&Children’s Wear”,“Daizy Boutique” and “Daizy Nimbin” – as a trademark before The Iconic trademarked “Dazie” on December 18,2017.
“Each of the following signs,Daisy[and] Daizy,is substantially identical with the Dazie mark,” Shein said in its statement of cross-claim.
“The Iconic is not the owner of the Dazie mark as at the priority date,” the documents stated. “The Dazie mark is liable to be cancelled under[the Trade Marks Act 1995].”
Loading
The Iconic has denied all Shein’s claims,countering that “Daisy” and its variations were not used as trademarks by those businesses or individuals,and denied Shein’s claim to any relief.
“The cross-respondent[The Iconic] is entitled to retain its registration of the Dazie mark by reason of its honest concurrent use of the Dazie mark,” the Sydney-based company stated in its defence document.
A spokesperson for The Iconic said it would not comment further as legal proceedings were ongoing.