Even oureconomy is infar better shape than most could have hoped for,and certainly it’s doing better than many others around the world.
Loading
All of this was achieved because we squashed transmission so effectively.
If an alternative strategy had been pursued,the results aren’t something you’d need to imagine – you only have to look to the United Kingdom and the United States to see the stark and tragic reality of what would have happened.
Although it clearly has been a tough time for all of us,it could have been much worse.
A number of those questioning the COVID-zero approach seem to think there’s a choice of living more freely and not having the virus spread uncontrollably and causing widespread illness and deaths.
But this isn’t true based on our understanding of how COVID spreads,particularly withthe Delta variant. This virus is just too infectious to be able to keep in check in the community.
NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian announcing a record number of daily coronavirus cases at her daily press conference in Sydney.Credit:Rhett Wyman
Scientists think it’s around50 per cent more contagious than the Alpha variant,originating in the UK,which was more infectious than the original strain. This makes contact tracingso much harder.
There’s no better evidence of how difficult it is to control the transmission of the virus than what we’re seeing happening in NSW right now.
We’re still in an unstable situation
The number of fully vaccinated people isn’t even close to the levels required to attenuate transmission. Only28 per cent of people over 16 have been fully vaccinated.
The recentDoherty Institute modelling suggests lockdowns become much less likely once upwards of 70-80 per cent of the eligible population is fully vaccinated.
Right now,we still have a very infectious virus circulating in a mostly non-immune population.
Metaphorically,we’re in a tinder dry bush on a hot summer’s day where one spark can lead to a raging bushfire.
While this unstable dynamic exists,living with the virus isn’t an option.
The only option is to respond aggressively and eliminate the virus in order to enjoy some freedoms while we wait for the effect of vaccines to kick in.
The alternative is to risk what we’re seeing in NSW,which is incredibly concerning even with significant restrictions.
We keep seeing the benefits of going early and hard,and with the emergence of the Delta variant this seems to be more true than ever.
We’ll get through this,if we stay the course
Getting high vaccination coverage will be the game-changer.
When vaccination levels increase,the unstable situation we are currently in moves more towards an equilibrium. Then,the drivers for infection are more counterbalanced by immunity in the population.
Getting high vaccination coverage will be the game-changer.Credit:Alex Ellinghausen
When we get vaccine coverage to high levels and the majority of the vulnerable population are immunised,we can start to have more confidence any community transmission can be contained and we can contemplate living with the virus. Then,you can start to safely increase your tolerance for cases circulating in the community.
Most importantly,this is the time when we all have to make the significant mental shift from treating COVID like a pandemic disease,to treating it just like another endemic infection such as influenza.
There may still be some spot fires to put out as we open up and take on more risk of exposure to COVID. But at this point,more targeted public health responses will be able to address outbreaks and the need for the brutal sledgehammer of lockdowns will be largely behind us.
Loading
So,while talk of relaxing restrictions and living with the virus are premature,we should be reassured the time for this isn’t too far away.
Getting vaccines into people is the priority and the faster we do this,the faster we move to the final phase of the pandemic in this country.
The pandemic has been a marathon,and we have collectively hit the wall. But if we push through and get vaccination coverage up past 70 per cent,the end is in sight.
Hassan Vally is Associate Professor in Epidemiology at La Trobe University. This article was first published on The Conversation.