The barrister for the man accused of murdering campers Russell Hill and Carol Clay has told a Supreme Court jury the prosecution case had “gone off the rails”.
The defence barrister for the accused killer says no motive,junk theories and unfairness to an innocent man are among the “lowlights” of the prosecution case.
The lead prosecutor has urged a Supreme Court jury to reject Gregory Lynn’s version of events over the deaths of Russell Hill and Carol Clay at a campsite in 2020.
The prosecutor has asked the jury to reject as “complete fiction” accused killer Gregory Lynn’s claim the deaths of missing campers Russell Hill and Carol Clay were accidental.
Prosecutors say it’s impossible that Gregory Lynn is innocent of murdering missing campers Russell Hill and Carol Clay. Lynn says their deaths were accidental.
Former airline pilot Gregory Lynn,who has pleaded not guilty over the alleged murders of campers Russell Hill and Carol Clay,gave evidence in the Supreme Court on Thursday.
Breaking his silence for the first time,Gregory Lynn revealed to the jury that his family found it “quite comical” how similar his car was to the Nissan Patrol police were searching for in the missing campers case. Follow our live updates.
A jury has been told the former pilot will be the only witness for the defence after prosecutors closed their case in the Supreme Court on Wednesday.
In a recorded interview played to a Supreme Court jury,the former pilot said he knew he was on police’s radar over the disappearance of Russell Hill and Carol Clay.
The former airline pilot told police he had tried to cover up the accidental deaths of Russell Hill and Carol Clay because it would have been an “absolute disaster” for his family and career.
The defence for alleged double murderer Gregory Lynn has accused the prosecution of collaborating with a blood-spatter expert to introduce a new theory without warning.