There is no incentive or financial imperative for the operators to ensure riders in Victoria are doing the right thing so they don’t negatively impact other members of the community.
Loading
Parking and dumping of e-scooters continues to be a major failure of the trial. They are supposed to be left “in an upright position on the kerbside,in a manner that does not obstruct the footpath for pedestrians,at least 1.5 metres from buildings”. Yet they are frequently parked close to buildings,across footpaths,over pram ramps,over pedestrian crossings,at public transport stops and even on the ground surface tiles that guide people who are blind.
The number of trips undertaken by e-scooters is insufficient to have an appreciable impact on traffic congestion. Many of the trips have replaced walking,which is not good from a health,economic and environmental perspective. Then there are trips just for fun,a bit like jet-skis at the beach.
The government recently decided to extend the trial. The lack of a proper,transparent evaluation and public consultation,particularly with those most negatively impacted,is worrying.
Recent research on how to improve rider compliance,particularly parking,found in-app messaging for e-scooter programs and signage did very little to change behaviour. Rather,dedicated parking bays or requiring e-scooters be locked to bike racksimproves compliance.
Loading
This brings us to one of the trial’s fundamental flaws – it allows and actively encourages parking on the footpath,meaning most trips start or end with illegal footpath riding.
This is why cities overseas,such as Bristol in the UK,have stipulated future hire schemes can only use designated on-road parking spots instead of on footpaths,unless it is clearthey won’t obstruct people walking.
If our trial is to continue,there are five things that must happen,at a minimum.
First,completely ban dockless footpath parking in favour of dedicated on-road parking bays,and the same for bike hire schemes.
Loading
Second,engage contractors to impound inappropriately parked e-scooters,similar to how vehicles are towed when parked in clearways. The issue of bad parking would all but disappear if the operators had to pay to recover these e-scooters. Some operators already require users to submit a photo of where they parked an e-scooter,adding accountability to their system.
Third,provide a TAC-style no-fault insurance cover for injured pedestrians.
Fourth,resource police to provide consistent policing of footpath riding. Vulnerable people should be able to feel safe while walking.
Finally,collect and evaluate and publish independent data on all aspects of the trial,and give voice to the vulnerable Victorians most affected by the arrival of e-scooters on our streets. Without this,the government is at risk of appearing to let private businesses dictate transport policy without proper scrutiny.
Our governments espouse equity,inclusion,access and social participation as a cornerstone of healthy,fairer communities. Will they remain true to these principles? Will they change the trial and hold operators to account,or let them call the shots?
The Opinion newsletter is a weekly wrap of views that will challenge,champion and inform your own.Sign up here.
More original opinions
Home invasion: Former Victorian Attorney-General and now director of the Centre for Innovative Justice,Rob Hulls,had hisfamily home invaded while everyone was sleeping. He would like to meet the criminals and ask them why.
Enough with private schools: After a multitude of private school scandals Jenna Price calls todefund them all now and to also “examine the values these schools teach to an ever-increasing number of students enrolled”.
Death as a teacher:When Waleed Aly’s mother-in-law Jan was dying,he found these last moments to bebeautiful and harrowing. “It’s also one of the most clarifying. The moment of death takes our vast,complex lives,and reveals them to be simple.”